Turn ten bilingual PDFs into a traceable Chinese evidence table
All three products have relevant file or research features, but none has been confirmed against every input, citation, export and US$20 monthly requirement for these PDFs. There is no qualified recommendation yet: search or citation support alone does not cover all ten sources.
Sources checked 2026-09-23
The task
Use monthly billing of at most US$20 to compare ten public Chinese and English PDFs into a Chinese evidence table, with traceable citations, noted disagreements and an exportable deliverable. File sizes and scan quality are not yet known.
Official sources checked 23 September 2026. Budgets assume a US personal account, USD before tax and monthly billing without annual prepayment. Region, eligibility and checkout prices can differ, and nothing here is a generation, quality or workload test.
Candidates
Meets the documented conditions is not the same as a completed task: it means the conditions listed in the official pages are satisfied, and the limits below still apply.
Perplexity
Unconfirmed; not recommended yetThis month: The official hub lists Pro at $20 a month or $200 a year, so monthly billing fits this pre-tax budget while the annual total is a different commitment.
A qualifying price does not establish the ten-file task. File analysis and cited answers are supported and Pro lists up to 50 files per project with research and upload limits, but the evidence-table export format, locating a passage in the original PDF, and disagreement coverage were not verified.
- Do not carry over older unlimited-upload wording.
- Applicable per-file size limits were not established.
Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM
Unconfirmed; not recommended yetThis month: Standard is free with 50 sources per notebook; the checked US bundle prices are AI Plus at US$7.99 a month and AI Pro at US$19.99, and neither is a separate Notebook subscription.
Ten sources fit the count limit, but that does not prove these files meet the size and text requirements or are read in full. Known audio and slide exports do not establish export of the evidence table you need, and citation preservation with Chinese disagreement analysis remains untested.
- Each source is capped at 500,000 words and uploads at 200MB, so a large or scanned file may not qualify.
- Usage has been metered by compute since September 2, with five-hour refreshes and weekly limits; older daily-count tables are not a current guarantee.
Kimi
Unconfirmed; not recommended yetThis month: Projects permits 50 files at 100MB each, and Free lists two projects with 500MB of project storage; a new-plan USD monthly billing cycle was not verified.
Deep Research supports cited reports with PDF and Word exports, but complete transfer of ten Project files into that separate workflow is unverified, and the researcher context is 128K with input recommended below 100K. Files are read on demand rather than in full every time.
- A US$19 in-app purchase listing without a stated period is not a monthly price, so it is not used here.
- Project capacity is not researcher context.
Keep the limits separate
Gemini Notebook metering, Perplexity plan allowances and Kimi Projects storage measure three different things, and one cannot substitute for another. The education-plan prose on Perplexity plan page also differs from its own limits table, so the narrower metered wording is kept here. Capacity is never upgraded into a guarantee that the whole task fits.
Next check
Inventory the ten files for size, page count and whether text is selectable, then confirm that the exact account and plan can use all sources in one workflow. The output table should carry the claim, the filename, a page or identifiable passage, and where sources disagree; after export, check every row back against the original PDF. An unknown input, cost or export requirement blocks a recommendation. The presence of a citation does not prove the citation is correct.
Where every claim comes from
Each link was opened and read on the date shown. The note describes what that page actually supports.
- Perplexity hub - cost FAQ ↗
Pro at $20 a month or $200 a year. The same page markets unlimited Pro Search, which conflicts with the help centre plan table; the narrower metered wording is kept.
Read 2026-09-23
- Perplexity - which plan is right for you ↗
Pro Search and research query limits by plan, which are the metered figures used here.
Read 2026-09-23
- Perplexity - what is Pro ↗
Project file counts and Pro features; it does not establish the export format of an evidence table.
Read 2026-09-23
- Gemini Notebook - plans ↗
Standard permits 50 sources per notebook. The paid allowances discussed here come through eligible Google AI bundles, not a standalone Notebook subscription.
Read 2026-09-23
- Gemini Notebook - source limits ↗
500,000 words per source and 200MB per upload.
Read 2026-09-23
- Gemini Notebook - usage change ↗
Compute-based metering with five-hour refreshes and weekly limits, which supersedes older daily counts.
Read 2026-09-23
- Google AI Plus availability - US price ↗
The US Google AI Plus price of US$7.99 a month, as a bundle rather than a Notebook subscription.
Read 2026-09-23
- Google AI student offer - AI Pro renewal price ↗
The regular US$19.99 monthly AI Pro renewal price; the student eligibility itself is not extended to all accounts.
Read 2026-09-23
- Kimi - Projects ↗
File counts, per-file size and project storage, and that files are read on demand.
Read 2026-09-23
- Kimi - membership pricing ↗
The membership page as read; a USD monthly cycle was not verified from it.
Read 2026-09-23
- Kimi - Deep Research ↗
Cited reports and PDF or Word exports from the separate research entry point.
Read 2026-09-23
- Kimi - Deep Research limits ↗
128K context with input recommended below 100K.
Read 2026-09-23